Turning down aid from our neighbor and allie Canada: BAD
Using Red Tape to stop a mobile hospital from going in: BAD
Making a photo op out of touring a disaster: BAD
FEMA failing to do it's job, and showing yet further incompetency: BAD
Not sending in the National Guard in a much needed time of disaster until it was too late: BAD
Legislating how much federal aid will go towards relief: BAD
Failing to properly evacuate the affected regions in time: BAD
See where this is going????????
Well Philip came across something, I happened to agree with this individuals views and opinions, see what you think of it. http://www.livejournal.com/users/mi
September 5 2005, 09:37:38 UTC 6 years ago
September 5 2005, 09:38:35 UTC 6 years ago
September 5 2005, 11:43:14 UTC 6 years ago
You should go read through some of the people's blogs that are on the
I've been very careful to not take the word of just any Joe Blow that writes something in his or her blog and have been reading the news outlets to see if their opinions and statements are backed up. They have been, in almost every case. There have been very few times that they haven't been backed up. That was when the statements were so outrageous as to not be believed without even trying to check up on them, or so minor as to not make any difference. There's been some really wild speculations running around right now, and unfortunately, the major news outlets and congressional webpages all back them up almost all of them.
I'm not sure what day this happened, but I can see (in one way) why they might have stopped it. Things in New Orleans are very shaky, even now. They may have been afraid of the problems that the people on the hospital might have encountered. Now, we won't go into WHY that town is in the mess it's in and why they may have felt this was a necessary step. We all know why.
September 5 2005, 11:43:42 UTC 6 years ago
I had to make two comments to get it all in!
They have to do this. It was basically a formality, there was never any doubt that it would have been approved. From the little I know about legislation, they have to make sure that the president doesn't ask for something that isn't needed, or that they don't want to give. (An example: He wants to fund his own private little thing that would do more harm than good, they have the right to stop him.) Also, it's to make sure that the American people know that yes, this is a legal action. It's making sure that the American people know that this is a valid expense that is needed, and not just some waste of public money. (I know, they waste more than that every year. Just trying to explain some of why this was done this way.) By the way, the president said he wanted $10.5B (?) and the legislators said yup, you get $10.5B, they never argued the point at all. Oh, and this number is on top of what is already being spent. Basically it was an extra $10.5B on top of what has already been spent. It's annoying and on the surface seems a bad way to do things, but in cases like this, there is never a doubt that it will be approved. Also, I'm sure that this will only be the beginning, and I doubt all the other requests that the president makes will be with much less fanfair, as will the approvals of the requests.
This event, while forseen, couldn't really be foreseen, if you can understand where I'm going. The people that were left behind in this event were either the ones that for one reason or another refused to leave, or for one reason or another couldn't leave. (And I am WAY past the point of saying that anyone was stupid for staying, I myself have grown up a lot in the past few days.) But, evacuating all of the people that stayed for whatever reason? There just wasn't enough time or resources. Ever try to take three 50 pound bags of grain, mix them all together and then try to get them all seperated into their original bags in only 48 hours, with your eyes closed? Along the same lines. Can we say herding cats? Yes, more could have been done. But it would have been damn nigh impossible to do so and would have taken more resources than really needs to be spent getting people out. Especially when FEMA(rred, as in fubared) promised that resources were being lined up to go into the affected areas as soon as the storm went away. They local and state governments had some peace of mind in leaving so many people behind in thinking that aid would arrive quickly. (I think I just came up with a new way to described something that has been totally fucked up and screwed up. Femarred. Gonna have to try to get that into the common lexicon.)
Uhm...let's see? Anything else I can argue with or explain? Nope, looks good, or rather, very very bad.
September 5 2005, 17:51:43 UTC 6 years ago
Re: I had to make two comments to get it all in!
Femarred sounds too close to Femurred. I don't wanna be describing things as if they've been bludgeoned by leg bones, sorry.Can we just declare things "Bushed" instead? It's like botched only with more connotations of "i'm a worthless fuckup who's never had to practice independant thought or reasoning because everythings been handed to me or done for me".
September 5 2005, 22:53:50 UTC 6 years ago
Re: I had to make two comments to get it all in!
And then there's the original meaning of the word. Tired, worn out. Which I think we all are right now. The only time that I liked him in his whole term was when 9/11 happened. I don't think that Clinton would have been able to handle it as well. Anything after that...well...that's at least a three comment rant.